MENINGKATKAN PERFORMA KUALITAS PEMASOK LUAR NEGERI DIDALAM METODE PLAN-DO-CHECK-ACT MELALUI OPTIMALISASI KOLABORASI PEMASOK DI SEKTOR OTOMOTIF
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31539/zk6j3845Keywords:
PDCA cycle, Overseas Supplier Collaboration, Cultural Communication, Cross-Cultural Management.Abstract
Dalam industri otomotif global saat ini, kolaborasi dengan pemasok luar negeri sangat penting tetapi sering terpengaruh oleh waktu respons yang lambat, kurangnya transparansi, dan hambatan budaya. Di PT. Global Motor Manufacturing (GMM), penerapan Plan-Do-Check-Act tidak menangani secara memadai masalah kualitas yang berulang dan lamanya waktu investigasi, dalam studi ini, pemasok berasal dari China, India, dan Korea Selatan. Kesenjangan yang terus-menerus ini disebabkan oleh akses terbatas terhadap proses pemasok, komunikasi yang tidak terstruktur, dan kurangnya keselarasan budaya dan teknis. Studi ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif melalui wawancara semi-terstruktur dengan anggota internal QA, pemasok luar negeri, QA Head Quarter, dan pakar QA dari perusahaan competitor. Analisis tematik menyoroti tantangan untama disetiap fase PDCA dan memungkinkan perumusan Solusi yang ditargetkan dan dapat ditindak lanjuti. Studi ini mengusulkan seperangkat Solusi bisnis universal dan spesifik negara. Ini termasuk standar template pelaporan cacat, alat digital kolaboratif, tinjauan kinerja pemasok secara berkala, dan pengembangan kompetensi budaya yang ditargetkan. Solusi ini dirancang untuk memperkuat kepercayaan, meningkatkan responsivitas, dan menyelaraskan standar kualitas dan performa kualitas dalam jaringan pemasok luar negeri. Dengan menggabungkan solusi ini dalam setiap siklus PDCA, studi ini memberikan kontribusi berupa PDCA yang disempurnakan yang disesuaikan dengan realitas kolaborasi pemasok global. Dengan menggabungkan praktik etis, pemahaman budaya, dan disiplin proses, kerangka ini mengubah QA dari tugas reaktif menjadi fungsi strategis proaktif dan mendukung daya saing jangka panjang disektor otomotif.
References
[1] Abuzaid, A., Ghadi, M., & Madadha, S. M. (2024). The Effect of Ethical Leadership on Innovative Work Behaviors A Mediating–Moderating Model of Psychological Empowerment, Job Crafting, Proactive Personality, and Person–Organization Fit. Administrative Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14090191
[2] Aditi, Govindan, K., & Jha, P. C. (2024). Modelling of barriers in implementing sustainable manufacturer-supplier collaboration and coping strategies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139635
[3] Ahmad, M. F., Zakuan, N., Jusoh, A., & Takala, J. (2013). Review of relationship between TQM and business performance. In Applied Mechanics and Materials (Vol. 315, pp. 166–170). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.315.166
[4] Bağış, M., Kryeziu, L., Akbaba, Y., Ramadani, V., Karagüzel, E. S., & Krasniqi, B. A. (2022). The micro-foundations of a dynamic technological capability in the automotive industry. Technology in Society, 70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102060
[5] Browndon Achu, C., & Patrick Kongnyuy, W. (2021). Dynamics of Conflict Management Strategies as A Predictor to Secondary School Climate in the North West Region of Cameroon. International Journal on Integrated Education, 4(7). https://doi.org/10.31149/ijie.v4i7.2041
[6] Encinas Bartos, K., Schwarzkopf, J., & Mueller, M. (2024). The role of trainings in improving supplier sustainability performance. World Development, 175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2023.106482
[7] Graça, S. S., & Barry, J. M. (2019). A global examination of cognitive trust in business-to-business relationships. In Advances in Business Marketing and Purchasing (Vol. 26, pp. 7–36). Emerald Group Publishing Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1069-096420190000026005
[8] Jagusiak-Kocik, M. (2014). ENSURING CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT PROCESSES THROUGH STANDARDIZATION IN THE AUTOMOTIVE COMPANY. Production Engineering Archives, 2/1(1), 12–15. https://doi.org/10.30657/pea.2014.02.04
[7] Jermsittiparsert, K., & Srihirun, W. (2019). Role of ethics in supply chain management: Culture as moderator. Humanities and Social Sciences Reviews, 7(3), 736–743. https://doi.org/10.18510/hssr.2019.73105
[8] Koley, G., & Rao, S. (2018). Adaptive Human-Agent Multi-Issue Bilateral Negotiation Using the Thomas- Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument. IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/DISTRA.2018.8601002
[9] Kristensen, H. S., & Remmen, A. (2019). A framework for sustainable value propositions in product-service systems. Journal of Cleaner Production, 223, 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.074
[10] Malega, P., Daneshjo, N., Rudy, V., & Drábik, P. (2021). PDCA Cycle - Tool for Improvement of the Business Processes – Case Study. TEM Journal, 10(3), 1336–1347. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM103-42
[11] Modungwa, M., Rinke, M., Agigi, A., & Mocke, K. (2021). The role of strategic supplier relationships in enhancing supply chain innovation: A qualitative study in the South African automotive manufacturing industry. African Journal of Science, Technology, Innovation and Development, 13(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/20421338.2020.1747166
[12] Nguyen, H., Onofrei, G., & Truong, D. (2021). Supply chain communication and cultural compatibility: performance implications in the global manufacturing industry. Business Process Management Journal, 27(1), 253–274. https://doi.org/10.1108/BPMJ-08-2019-0314
[13] Rachman, Z. H. (2020). Enhancing Human Capital Development with Knowledge Management Strategy through Public Private Partnership. Journal of Infrastructure Policy and Management, 3(1), 11–15. https://doi.org/10.35166/jipm.v3i1.24
[14] Rangel-Sánchez, M. Á., Urbina-González, J. D. J., Carrera-Escobedo, J. L., Guirette-Barbosa, O. A., Murillo-Rodríguez, V. A., Celaya-Padilla, J. M., Durán-Muñoz, H. A., & Cruz-Domínguez, O. (2024). Enhancing Scrap Reduction in Electric Motor Manufacturing for the Automotive Industry: A Case Study Using the PDCA (Plan–Do–Check–Act) Approach. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 14(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/app14072999
[15] Spichak, I., Stenyushkina, S., Polevoy, I., Nazarova, A., & Kucheryavenko, S. (2021). SWOT analysis as a strategic tool for developing the quality management system of an educational organization. BIO Web of Conferences, 30. https://doi.org/10.1051/bioconf/20213003005
[16] Valentini, C., & Kruckeberg, D. (2018). “Walking the environmental responsibility talk” in the automobile industry: An ethics case study of the Volkswagen environmental scandal. Corporate Communications, 23(4), 528–543. https://doi.org/10.1108/CCIJ-04-2018-0045
[17] Vanalle, R. M., & Santos, L. B. (2014). Green supply chain management in Brazilian automotive sector. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 25(5), 523–541. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-06-2013-0066
[18] Xie, X., Liu, X., & Chen, J. (2023). A meta-analysis of the relationship between collaborative innovation and innovation performance: The role of formal and informal institutions. Technovation, 124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102740
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Muhammad Thoriq Aziz, Andika Putra Pratama

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.